


It is more similar to 1 vs 1 then other game mode and unit saturation is higher so demand for map awareness is less.Įxpert is a dumb fk, you just have to preserve your tanks until he has insane loses and then you push on the base and its gg.

If you want to join in 1 vs 1 the best option would be 1) consistently beat expert AI 1 vs 1 and 2) if 1 vs 1 MP is overwhelming try 2 vs 2 MP first. Originally posted by mustachewarfare:1 vs 1 is generally where you will see most competitive players. Id really like you to cite an example of an online game that doesnt require learning before instantly diving into 1v1s with actual players since this seems to be your main concern with this game.ĭude, I am playing rts games for about 20yrs, I've played coh1 & coh2 since released and I know every little mechanic in this games, I watch pro tournaments and I do spot all kinds of mistakes easily, i just can't play myself, idk maybe I just can't think about micro and macro same time while queuing tons of commands, i do stupid blunders and i lose most 1v1 games in 1-2 mins.īut sometimes i just don't know how to counter some asymmetric openings, like ie when brit is in a green cover on the sector that you have to take and you don't have any mg or mortar to push him out yet, so whatever I do here is wrong and the root is that all axis inf in cover except ostrupen is unefficient against british and american inf in the same exact cover, but when i play soviets i will be bullied by sturmpios for the entire early game until i have the shock troops, my mgs and mortars are always outflanked and avoided and burnt to dust when I try to do what my enemies did in the same early game scenario, and it doesn't feel like a skill that I could ever learn. Im not sure what youre expecting when jumping into online play before having even figured out basic game mechanics. Originally posted by Muni:while i commend you for going 1v1 instead of immediately falling into 4v4 hell like most newbies who will never improve.
